Skip to content
ARAsylum ResearchImmigration & Asylum Expert Witness
Expertise· INDIVIDUALISED RISK

Risk of Return Assessment

An individualised assessment of the objective risk a claimant would face on return, tested against current in-country conditions and the availability of state protection and internal relocation.

ROR

Terrain & internal relocation analysis
Terrain & internal relocation analysisROR
Evidence base

Primary source categories

  • Country guidance case law
  • UNHCR eligibility guidelines
  • Security & conflict monitors (ACLED)
  • NGO field reporting
  • Academic risk literature
  • In-country legal contacts
Methodology

How the expert gathers and tests the intelligence.

Risk profile

We take the accepted or asserted characteristics of the claimant and map them onto the objectively documented treatment of comparable individuals.

State protection

We assess whether a sufficiency of protection exists in practice — not merely in law.

Internal relocation

We evaluate whether relocation is both safe and reasonable, addressing reach of non-state actors and conditions in the proposed area.

Conclusion

Risk is expressed against the objective evidence. The credibility of the claimant's account remains a matter for the decision-maker.

Official guidance

Objectively contextualising government country notes.

Official country materials carry weight, but they are not the last word. Our reports engage them directly and transparently.

Country guidance

Where reported country guidance determinations apply, the report engages with them directly and identifies any evidence of a durable change of circumstances.

Official note divergence

Where official materials assert a general sufficiency of protection or viable relocation, we test that assertion against the current evidence and the claimant's specific profile.

Objective risk vs subjective fear

We assess the objective risk the evidence supports; the claimant's subjective account is expressly outside the expert's remit.

No forced concealment

Where relevant, a person cannot be expected to conceal a protected characteristic solely to avoid harm.

It is the duty of experts to help the decision-maker on matters within their expertise. This duty overrides any obligation to the person from whom experts have received instructions or by whom they are paid.

Expert duty to the court or tribunal